Dear all,
I share with you the paper that we are going to discuss next week, on Tuesday 30/05.
Comments of any kind are welcome, keep in mind that my deadline is 15th July, so I can still do quite a lot of edits. I’d particularly appreciate comments related to:
* the connection between the theoretical framework, the RQ and the discussion of the findings (do you see a smooth connection between what I anticipate in the TF, what I find and how TF and findings ‘talk’ to each other in light of the RQ?)
* the clarity/soundness of the methodology and how the execution of the method reflects into the discussion section
* the clarity of key terms and concepts
* the relative ‘weight’ of the different sections: should ‘discussion’ be longer? I have used all the space available (7500 words) but I can still do some internal re-shuffle.
* Others
Thanks so much for the effort, I hope you won’t have a hard time reading it :)
See you soon!
Best
Giordano
Giordano Zambelli
PhD fundamental research fellow - FWO
Media innovation and Journalism Studies
Pleinlaan 9 - 1050 Brussel
[cid683445FD-045E-4102-862E-DD52901C9C0A@home]
Recent Publications
Collaborative knowledge exchange: a new paradigm for media innovation?<https://smit.vub.ac.be/policy-brief-62-collaborative-knowledge-exchange-a-n…> (2022)
Establishing, Consolidating and Maintaining Online Revenues for Legacy Media<https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-95073-6_2#Sec2> (2022)
Participation In 'Intercultural Issues and Concepts A Multi-Disciplinary Glossary'<https://www.peterlang.com/document/1114409> (2021)
Current projects
Stars4Media<https://stars4media.eu/call-for-projects/>
