Dear NUSErs and friends,

 

Attached you will find our (Sarah, Ike, Pauljan) paper ‘When coping becomes civic risk: ‘Toxic’ news, delegation, and missed alarm signals.’

 

We presented an early draft of this paper during a workshop for a Special Issue on Distributed Citizenship (Journal: International Journal of Communication).

 

Also this version is still quite drafty 😊. Feel free to give feedback on structure, coherency of the story, …

We are particularly interested in:

 

Our deadline for submission to the Special Issue is 30th of May.

 

Thanks in advance and see you on Friday!

 

Met vriendelijke groeten

Kind regards

 

 A close up of a logo

Description automatically generated

PAULJAN TRUYENS

Researcher at imec-SMIT & VUB Communicatiewetenschappen

Coordinator at Mediapunt

T   +32 (0)494 68 68 94

E  pauljan.truyens@vub.be  

PL9.4 - Pleinlaan 9 - 1050 Brussel - www.vub.be

 

Main projects:

MediapuntVlaanderen.be

Nieuwsgebruik.be

Resilientmedia.eu

 

Publications:

ResearchGate

Pure portfolio

ORCID

 

 

 

Van: Constanza Gajardo via nuse_smit <nuse_smit@listserv.vub.be>
Datum: vrijdag, 13 maart 2026 om 17:04
Aan: nuse_smit@listserv.vub.be <nuse_smit@listserv.vub.be>
Onderwerp: [Nuse_smit] NUSE meeting paper

Dear all,

In preparation for next Friday’s unit meeting, please find attached a draft paper that we are currently working on with Courtney and Antonis as part of the INEQNEWS project.

 

In this paper, we attempt to combine findings from a three-wave survey with insights from online in-depth data-trace interviews. While we initially planned to only circulate the literature review, we decided to also include the methods and (preliminary) results sections, as they may help provide a clearer sense of the overall direction of the paper.

 

While there’s no particular deadline, ideally, we hope to submit it sometime before the summer to journals such as Social Media + Society, Human Communication Research, or New Media & Society. We are not clear about this yet, so suggestions are of course very welcome.

 

In particular, we would greatly appreciate your thoughts on the following:

  • Is the problematization clear and convincing?
  • Is the literature review clear, and not too dense/repetitive?
  • We are currently experimenting with different ways of referring to “attention challenges” (e.g., attention control, attention problems). Since we do not want to frame this as a clinical issue but rather as a broader phenomenon related to attention, we would welcome suggestions on how best to approach this conceptually.
  • Any thoughts on key elements that should be highlighted in the discussion section?

 

Many thanks and looking forward to your feedback. 

 

Have a great weekend!

Best,

Constanza