dear all,

please find attached the draft of D3.1.

Please check:

• names and contributors pp1-2  - every partner
• reading materials
• it should be revised to make sure only the most relevant articles and cases are recommended (2-4 per category maximum). for example: in topic 2-3 there are loads of cases, in topic 10 there are way too many links and references, topic 11 is empty. try to put 2-3 entries in each category (required reading, additional reading, case law) prioritizing the official documents (e.g. wp29 guidelines) – every partner his/her own topics
• we could/should suggest our own materials (easier to justify) instead of others’ – every partner to any topic

these lists could be then copied in the notes of the intro slides of the respective presentations

the formatting of the forms and sheets changed only because of the deliverable format.

d3.2 is expected to have the same content, short of the training scenarios.

i

István Böröcz, LL.M.

Research Group on Law, Science, Technology & Society (LSTS)   |   Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)

Room 4C339, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

http://www.vub.ac.be/LSTS/