Good for us.
From: <star-bounces@listserv.vub.ac.be> on behalf of Gábor Kulitsán <kulitsan.gabor@naih.hu>
Date: Monday, 16 April 2018 at 11:52
To: Lina JASMONTAITE <Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be>, "star@listserv.vub.ac.be" <star@listserv.vub.ac.be>
Subject: Re: [star] STAR II: preparation of the GA
Dear All,
Okay then, if everyone agrees I'll set 1st June as starting date in the EC Portal.
Gábor
P.S.: I'm out of office this week. I see the e-mails, but I may react a little slower.
Idézet (Lina JASMONTAITE <Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be>):
Dear all,
So we agree upon starting STAR II at the begging of June with the kick of meeting in Budapest.
Best regards,
Lina
On 16 Apr 2018, at 10:32, Istvan Mate BOROCZ <Istvan.Mate.Borocz@vub.be> wrote:
Dear all,
the idea was to use the travel costs proportionately and to organize similar amount of f2f events in the cities of NAIH, TRI and VUB:
KOM: Budapest
Workshop 1: Dublin
Workshop 2: Brussels
Workshop 3: Dublin
Book launch: Budapest
re the starting date: usually it is either the beginning or the middle of the month (i.e. 1st or 15th). preferably 1st so the deliverable deadlines can be followed and met more easily. The proposed meeting/workshop can be held at any time during the respective month.
re the starting month: As Filippo pointed out " August would not be the best month to commence a stakeholder mapping activities due to holidays and conflicting deadlines ". Indeed, but if the project starts in June, August will be M3, where the work should already commence. Additionally, as Lina said, June is quite packed for VUB because of the summer school and other deadlines. If the project starts in July or in August, the interviews and operative work effectively start in September without a problem. In any case, September as a starting month should be avoided because of overlaps with STAR I.
br
i
--
István Böröcz, LL.M.
d.pia.lab | Brussels Laboratory for Data Protection & Privacy Impact Assessments
Research Group on Law, Science, Technology & Society (LSTS) | Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Room 4C339, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
http://www.vub.ac.be/LSTS/ | http://dpialab.brussels
-----Original Message-----
From: star-bounces@listserv.vub.ac.be <star-bounces@listserv.vub.ac.be> On Behalf Of David Wright
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 9:29 AM
To: sziklay.julia@naih.hu
Cc: star@listserv.vub.ac.be
Subject: Re: [star] STAR II: preparation of the GA
It's always a pleasure to visit Budapest, so a kick-off for STAR-II in Budapest in early June would be perfect for us.
Thanks and best.
David
On 16/04/2018, 07:56, "sziklay.julia@naih.hu" <sziklay.julia@naih.hu> wrote:
Dear David, we have no problem with an early start if you agree that
the kick-off meeting takes place in Budapest. Julia
dézet (David Wright <David.wright@trilateralresearch.com>):Hi, Gabor,
Is there a problem for you starting STAR II at the beginning of June?
Best.
David
From: <star-bounces@listserv.vub.ac.be> on behalf of Gábor Kulitsán
<kulitsan.gabor@naih.hu>
Organization: NAIH
Date: Friday, 13 April 2018 at 10:48
To: 'Lina JASMONTAITE' <Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be>
Cc: "star@listserv.vub.ac.be" <star@listserv.vub.ac.be>
Subject: Re: [star] STAR II: preparation of the GA
Dear Lina,
Dear All,
Our bank details have been validated, so we added the bank details
in the EC portal and we also signed the DoH.
Taking into account your comments I would suggest 9th or 16th July
to start the project. If it is OK for you I will set it in the system.
If you have no objections, we would host the Kick-off Meeting of
STARII with pleasure, but if you have any suggestions, please let us
know.
Best,
Gábor
From: Lina JASMONTAITE [mailto:Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 5:32 PM
To: Kulitsán Gábor <kulitsan.gabor@naih.hu>;
Filippo.Marchetti@trilateralresearch.com
Cc: star@listserv.vub.ac.be
Subject: Re: [star] STAR II: preparation of the GA
Dear Gabor and Filippo,
Many thanks for your input. We will adapt Annex B accordingly and
upload it not the EC portal by the end of this week.
Starting the project at the end of June may be problematic for VUB
as we are going to host the third summer school on data protection.
The beginning of June or mid July would be better for us.
Best regards,
Lina Jasmontaite
Doctoral researcher
Law, Science, Technology and Society (LSTS)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Brussels Privacy Hub (BPH)
Room 4B306, Pleinlaan 2, 1050
Brussels, Belgium
www.vub.ac.be/LSTS/<http://www.vub.ac.be/LSTS/> ||
www.vub.ac.be<http://www.vub.ac.be> ||
www.brusselsprivacyhub.org<http://www.brusselsprivacyhub.org>
On 10 Apr 2018, at 16:04, Kulitsán Gábor
<kulitsan.gabor@naih.hu<mailto:kulitsan.gabor@naih.hu>> wrote:
Dear Lina,
Thank you for your e-mail. Here are our answers:
1. Missing info in the PP: Details of NAIH department that is
going to carry out the project are added. As I informed you last
week we have not signed the Declaration of Honour yet because of the
followings: we could not select our Bank Account in the EC Portal
yet, because first we had to update our organisation’s data on the
Participant Portal by uploading the duly completed Financial
Identification form. We did this last Friday, but the validation of
this bank account may take a few days. Once it is validated we will
select it in the EC portal, and then we will validate the partner
summary info and we will also sign the Declaration of Honour. I
already asked the PO (Anne De Wolf) and the Validation Service (Kim
Schotanus) whether we can or have to sign the DoH without our bank
details being verified, but I have not received any answer so far.
1. Starting date of the Project: We also would suggest to start
the project earlier than August. Last week of June may be appropriate.
1. Scope of the Project: We agree with Filippo’s suggestion.
1. Hotline: NAIH will not be able to operate the hotline in
multiple Languages. English (and Hungarian of course) is OK, but it
is unfortunately highly unlikely that we will have / we can find
such colleagues who know other languages at a high level. Because it
is essentially a pilot project, we plan to operate the hotline for
12 months for a start. First we have to see whether it is worth to
be operated or not, and if it will be successful and there will be a
need for it, it can be operated longer of course.
1. Results: We agree with Filippo’s suggestions and of course we
can incorporate the content of the Project’s website on NAIH’s
website.
Best,
Gábor
From:
star-bounces@listserv.vub.ac.be<mailto:star-bounces@listserv.vub.ac.be>
[mailto:star-bounces@listserv.vub.ac.be] On Behalf Of Filippo
Marchetti
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 12:05 PM
To: Lina JASMONTAITE
<Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be<mailto:Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be>>
Cc: star@listserv.vub.ac.be<mailto:star@listserv.vub.ac.be>
Subject: Re: [star] STAR II: preparation of the GA
Dear Lina,
Thank you for your email. Please find TRI's answers enclosed.
Part A: the missing points include:
* TRI validation of PIC status, so far it’s marked as DECLARED
TRI-IE is now validated. Should the system still show differently,
please let us know.
* Starting date of the project: it can be the first day of the
month after the entry into force of the GA or we can agree on a
fixed starting date. We prepared timeline projections of STAR and
STARII projects in order to see ‘peak times’. We consider August to
be the most optimal date for starting STARII.
We would strongly advise in favour of June as a starting month for
the following reasons:
* The first operative Workstream of the project regards the
mapping of stakeholder needs. August would not be the best month to
commence a stakeholder mapping activities due to holidays and
conflicting deadlines.
* We have the impression that the EC approved this project so
quickly for us to start asap. While May is not feasible for us, we
would be able and prefer to start on 1 June.
* The stakeholder mapping activities of STAR will be concluded
by the end of May. Therefore, following up sooner with other
interviews in a new project will help us consolidate our contacts
with DPAs and DPOs.
Part B: we have prepared a draft Annex B. For it to be completed we
need to agree upon changes that we are going to make in the DOW
based on the comments provided in the evaluation form. These
comments concern:
The scope of the project:
* The geographical spread of the proposal is not very clear. How
are you going to benefit all SMEs and data protection authorities in
all EU Member States if the practical activities are targeting one
single Member State (Hungary), and indirectly others?
* The target group is very broad, consisting of all SMEs in the
EU, on the one hand, and data protection authorities on the other
hand. How could we explain t this approach and what is the benefit
of providing such a Europe-wide effort?
* It is difficult to understand in the way the project is
written, whether the specific activities of the project target only
Hungarian SMEs or all SMEs in the EU.
We suggest to add a few lines describing how we will identify our
target for interviews and for the other activities, such as by
identifying key industries and business sectors to ensure a
consistent efficacy of the services. This would both serve as a
reassurance for the EC that the project is targeting the EU and not
just Hungary, and at the same time it would cast light about how we
aim to achieve a broad beneficial effect across sectors.
The hotline:
* This activity is not entirely convincingly presented. It is
stated that the hotline will be operated in English and Hungarian,
with other languages on needs basis. The results of the hotline
questions will again form a basis for research activity.
* The e-mail based "hotline" is planned for one year, and it is
not clear whether or how it will continue.
We suggest to reassure them that the hotline will be operated by
NAIH but that the other partners will support NAIH in answering
questions in other languages. We suggest to make some examples of
other languages we speak in the consortium, such as Dutch, Italian,
German …
Results:
* The EU-wide general handbook for SMEs raises challenges in
terms of addressing a wide variety of fields and types of SMEs in
various countries, which means the handbook remains quite general in
nature and thus might duplicate the already existing (CoE/FRA
general handbook). There are also some national differences in
implementation of data protection rules that the project might not
consider fully.
We are not sure that we should systematically consider all national
implementing legislation to the GDPR, as it would broaden the scope
of our handbook research beyond our capabilities. What we could do
is to decide 2-3 legal systems to focus on and compare when it comes
to analyse rules that need national implementation.
With regard to the risk of an overlap with the CoE general handbook,
we could underline that our approach would be different: while that
handbook is mainly focused on giving a plain overview of the
legislation, basically repeating the legislation, ours would tackle
specific issues, such as DPO, DPIAs, the right to be forgotten,
etc., based on the responses we collect from SMEs. To put it
differently, we could reassure them that our handbook will be an
issue-focused handbook rather than a general handbook.
* The responsibility regarding updating of the handbook is unclear.
We could reassure that the handbook will be updated at the end of
the project and that we are confident that at that point it will
cover most of the relevant issues.
* It is quite unlikely that SMEs might read about the project in
an academic journal. Relying mainly on academic analysis in the EU
as a whole, the needs assessment is not followed by the examination
of the specific needs of the Member States.
It is true that SMEs do not read academic journals, but this is not
the only way we connect with companies under this project.
* The project website will be maintained for two years only
after the end of the project. It’s suggested to incorporate the
content of the website on the NAIH’s website.
We could consider to maintain the standalone website for 4 years, as
it happens with other H2020 websites.
Best wishes,
Filippo
[Image removed by sender.]
Dr Filippo Marchetti
Trilateral Research Ltd.
72 Hammersmith Road, London W14
8TH<https://www.google.com/maps/place/Crown+House,+72+Hammersmith+Rd,+Hammersmith,+London+W14+8TH/@51.4945025,-0.2159555,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m8!1m2!2m1!1s72+Hammersmith+Road,+London+W14+8TH!3m4!1s0x48760fc063bcb7d3:0x15677ec4b20794b!8m2!3d51.4945025!4d-0.2137668>
+44 (0) 2075593550<tel:+442075593550>
www.trilateralresearch.com<http://www.trilateralresearch.com/>
[Image removed by sender.]<https://join.skype.com/invite/blxVbvjlCHEv>
[Image removed by sender.]<https://twitter.com/fmarchetti_tri>
[Image removed by sender.]<https://www.linkedin.com/in/filippomarchetti/>
Il giorno 05 apr 2018, alle ore 09:25, Lina JASMONTAITE
<Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be<mailto:Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be>> ha scritto:
Dear all,
Almost all information that is necessary for the completion of the
grant agreement has been entered into the EC portal.
Part A: the missing points include:
* Details of NAIH department that is going to carry out the
project and NAIH’s validation of partner summary info
* TRI validation of PIC status, so far it’s marked as DECLARED
* Starting date of the project: it can be the first day of the
month after the entry into force of the GA or we can agree on a
fixed starting date. We prepared timeline projections of STAR and
STARII projects in order to see ‘peak times’. We consider August to
be the most optimal date for starting STARII.
Part B: we have prepared a draft Annex B. For it to be completed we
need to agree upon changes that we are going to make in the DOW
based on the comments provided in the evaluation form. These
comments concern:
The scope of the project:
* The geographical spread of the proposal is not very clear. How
are you going to benefit all SMEs and data protection authorities in
all EU Member States if the practical activities are targeting one
single Member State (Hungary), and indirectly others?
* The target group is very broad, consisting of all SMEs in the
EU, on the one hand, and data protection authorities on the other
hand. How could we explain t this approach and what is the benefit
of providing such a Europe-wide effort?
* It is difficult to understand in the way the project is
written, whether the specific activities of the project target only
Hungarian SMEs or all SMEs in the EU.
The hotline:
* This activity is not entirely convincingly presented. It is
stated that the hotline will be operated in English and Hungarian,
with other languages on needs basis. The results of the hotline
questions will again form a basis for research activity.
* The e-mail based "hotline" is planned for one year, and it is
not clear whether or how it will continue.
Results:
* The EU-wide general handbook for SMEs raises challenges in
terms of addressing a wide variety of fields and types of SMEs in
various countries, which means the handbook remains quite general in
nature and thus might duplicate the already existing (CoE/FRA
general handbook). There are also some national differences in
implementation of data protection rules that the project might not
consider fully.
* The responsibility regarding updating of the handbook is unclear.
* It is quite unlikely that SMEs might read about the project in
an academic journal. Relying mainly on academic analysis in the EU
as a whole, the needs assessment is not followed by the examination
of the specific needs of the Member States.
* The project website will be maintained for two years only
after the end of the project. It’s suggested to incorporate the
content of the website on the NAIH’s website.
Could you please provide your suggestions on how we should address
comments made in the evaluation by COB 9 April?
Best regards,
Lina Jasmontaite
Doctoral researcher
Law, Science, Technology and Society (LSTS)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Brussels Privacy Hub (BPH)
Room 4B306, Pleinlaan 2, 1050
Brussels, Belgium
http://secure-web.cisco.com/15PF1KlBZlHULJPYUQqz7GcWNhHguO5Erk3ohn3AiBXFKYBZjZ2FgSfFqUSUxt0xZY_NylMcODishOowIqHYayERCYjpp0FhVkTqNoWFd-za2lq_i5wy_NTO9yVwG8HhRQ8WYt2nbfcLFH1JC0w4F3JzVXpx5o7dfHB48G9if8ivMJH-G64KIjK-mlC34AcI6mS9qhVvgO9fBSRPsMsGw-CmkIHRgjTOjRAOZskNCj6utio6_MUIf-OmMk6no7sCj/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vub.ac.be%2FLSTS%2F || http://secure-web.cisco.com/1rGBrw6DfMuRF1PGJbF-lJ-54m8ajR0E-2IyoxEfCJfhMtr_J7nuNkfgybjKsQjNIMbKySaoXO8q8KNKI5fs2qyyzsWSuQv_1tqX7mTl7sPg36Q7lqSXcDULhOjm_NRgbSw8SbgVW5J_j8O_8i7voDuAAMZgC4NTlj_BgRNcXNjgAVW556hBkdmfVYqWV74W_oys6aQorj-K29WsgA-4N9XGNeuD2K58ITOFzuA5YvPFQsbs1gEx5pLrCZem8QBuF9CsWvoQlJNGw4DzUT9CBMg/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vub.ac.be ||
http://secure-web.cisco.com/1fk-ioUDs0tp2pD3TdGsejRS_B74qo_tnDw168MW3cT2M3TnZCaDqai66-hG2Xrhi4NeINDM8sxumUP-wcXaehes_DbqLhZllYHZluUMI_N45lLe6JWrVMWwnZDeZbB72z0bO8AtHNPxfx455NX3zj2erKphebgBqdLYhhlB9a5tCSu_WaOfSWOf9DVT-e4aSAzUR8ab8IBKIYp0_08oD1eYhipVi0u57__F30VUHq9SlLbjTNT6e5xmJeI5xDz8_erdMoGITgAN4HNAUV8P_UA/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.brusselsprivacyhub.org
<STARII & STARI.xlsx>_______________________________________________
STAR mailing list
STAR@listserv.vub.ac.be<mailto:STAR@listserv.vub.ac.be>
https://listserv.vub.ac.be/mailman/listinfo/star_______________________________________________
STAR mailing list
STAR@listserv.vub.ac.be
https://listserv.vub.ac.be/mailman/listinfo/star
_______________________________________________
STAR mailing list
STAR@listserv.vub.ac.be
https://listserv.vub.ac.be/mailman/listinfo/star
_______________________________________________
STAR mailing list
STAR@listserv.vub.ac.behttps://listserv.vub.ac.be/mailman/listinfo/star