Hi all,
We’re going to publish the attached in our company newsletter, perhaps it is some help here.
DBW
From: Kulitsán Gábor kulitsan.gabor@naih.hu Sent: 20 February 2020 13:58 To: 'Lina JASMONTAITE' Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be Cc: 'STAR' star@listserv.vub.ac.be; 'Sziklay Júlia' sziklay.julia@naih.hu; 'Nagy Renáta' nagy.renata@naih.hu; David Barnard-Wills David.Barnard-Wills@trilateralresearch.com; Leanne Cochrane leanne.cochrane@trilateralresearch.com Subject: RE: [STAR II] Deliverable D4.2 rejected
Dear Lina,
I know, I’m a little bit confused about this too, especially since we have explained everything in the deliverable…
Anyway, if you could share any information (e.g. number of people interested, feedbacks received, etc.) on the panel at CPDB with me, then I will put it in the deliverable.
Best, Gábor
From: Lina JASMONTAITE [mailto:Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 11:32 AM To: Kulitsán Gábor <kulitsan.gabor@naih.humailto:kulitsan.gabor@naih.hu> Cc: 'STAR' <star@listserv.vub.ac.bemailto:star@listserv.vub.ac.be>; Sziklay Júlia <sziklay.julia@naih.humailto:sziklay.julia@naih.hu>; 'Nagy Renáta' <nagy.renata@naih.humailto:nagy.renata@naih.hu>; David Barnard-Wills <david.barnard-wills@trilateralresearch.commailto:david.barnard-wills@trilateralresearch.com>; Leanne Cochrane <leanne.cochrane@trilateralresearch.commailto:leanne.cochrane@trilateralresearch.com> Subject: RE: [STAR II] Deliverable D4.2 rejected
Dear Gabor,
I am a bit puzzled about this rejection letter. D4.2 in general should include a summary of the workshop of that is going to take place in BXL. I am not sure of a more detailed description of the panel at CPDP will be suffice in this case. We can share a provisional concept of the event at this point. If I recall it well, during the KOM we decided to merge the two workshops in order to be able to economise our travel budget and to get EAB members to attend this event.
This rejection certainly puts a lot of pressure on the upcoming event in Brussels.
Best regards, Lina
From: Kulitsán Gábor <kulitsan.gabor@naih.humailto:kulitsan.gabor@naih.hu> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 9:39 AM To: Lina JASMONTAITE <Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.bemailto:Lina.Jasmontaite@vub.be>; Leanne Cochrane <leanne.cochrane@trilateralresearch.commailto:leanne.cochrane@trilateralresearch.com>; David Barnard-Wills <david.barnard-wills@trilateralresearch.commailto:david.barnard-wills@trilateralresearch.com>; 'Nagy Renáta' <nagy.renata@naih.humailto:nagy.renata@naih.hu>; Sziklay Júlia <sziklay.julia@naih.humailto:sziklay.julia@naih.hu> Cc: 'STAR' <star@listserv.vub.ac.bemailto:star@listserv.vub.ac.be> Subject: [STAR II] Deliverable D4.2 rejected
Dear All,
The PO has requested the revision of Deliverable D4.2. (The rejection letter and the deliverable are enclosed).
In addition to the letter the policy unit made the following comments (see “Process communications” in the Research Portal):
“Regarding the other deliverable submitted: WP4 D4.2 D14 Third validation workshop (Dublin)
* This deliverable was rendered moot by the fact that the last two events are going to be merged in one
* It also indicates that STAR II was presented during this CPDP in Brussels,
* We would therefore expect that we will therefore not pay the full amount since only one, not two events will be organised
* Since the first event in Dublin was very disappointing (only 14 attendance, when 100 were foreseen), we could ask for improved dissemination of the event to be included in the deliverable, and for it to be resubmitted.”
If I understand correctly, the EC asks us to briefly report on the CPDP conference. @VUB and/or @TRI: Could you please summarize what happened at the CPDB and what was the outcome?
Thanks.
Gábor